I don’t know, what do you think dear reader? Is being able to tell what people are thinking something that comes with age, or is it a superpower that only a few possess?
Whatever it is, I can confidently say I have the power!
This superpower, or shall we call it, understanding, possibly comes from spending hundreds of hours sitting, thinking and then writing about myself (how tedious), but maybe I’m just projecting my faults and inadequacies onto everyone else and us humans are all very different and do not share common traits? What I do know, and I’m sure everyone else knows super powers or not, when you hear the term, no offence intended, you know you’re about to get insulted. So, while listening to Grimer’s Jamcrack Podcast the other day featuring Tom Pierce, I knew I was in for a bit of a savaging when Tom said, “No offence to Nick Bullock, but…”
This ‘no offence to Nick Bullock but’ came after Grimer had a proper rant about new routes. In his rant, Grimer said he was wound up about shit routes that people put up only because they want a first ascent and if it wasn’t a first ascent would they bother doing it. The tirade continued with, “These new routes are fucking annoying and bullshit, they (the first ascensionists), are not adding anything by doing it”.
So, this is where my name comes into it as Tom had recently climbed a route of mine I called Pathological at Rhoscolyn, he used this as an example of what Grimer was talking about. Tom is reasonably young, I’m sure he was excited to be chatting on the Jamcrack, and after listening to part two, I’d say he is a tad introverted, and I suspect at times it was just easier to go along with Niall without thinking too much about what it all means. I’d like to give Tom the benefit of doubt but to use Pathological as an example of what Grimer was talking about, was, in my mind a tad unfair (I want to say bollocks here, but I’m attempting to be fluffy). Tom possibly didn’t see by using this as an example and name checking me, he was including me in all of what Grimer had be ranting about, hmm, I’m not sure? A few sentences later he said he thought the route was quite cool. Bloody hell, make your mind up Tom, how to confuse a pensioner!
Pathological (I was pretty happy to come up with that name, I’m not usually that funny or clever), is actually a combination of new climbing and a section of the crag that had been climbed before.
The bottom three quarters of the climb were new until reaching the Warpath kneebar. It then climbs directly out of the kneebar on undercuts, and onto a well-defined arete. At the top of the arete, it joins the final few metres of Warpath before topping-out. A section of the arete had been climbed before by Twid Turner and Steve Long and called No Country for Young Men, they climbed this from a belay in The Sun and traversed onto the arete. The bit of the climb Tom didn’t like was the arete?
Unlike Tom, I think the whole outing is pretty good, as do the two other people I know who have climbed it, and to use Grimers indicator of shit new routes, if it wasn’t my route, I would still want to climb it, so not shit?
Not only does it climb the whole length of the cliff, it’s about as direct a line as you could imagine. Comici would have loved it, or more to the point, so would Messner as it’s as straight as a drop of falling water and passing through some super features (gives himself a big, chest puffed slap on the back), it’s all on natural gear and feels quite out there. I’ve climbed almost every route in the two zawns at Rhoscolyn, some of them many times, and I’m pretty sure it holds up.
Its only climbing I know, and it certainly isn’t solving the climate crisis, but if two people want to slag something down, and then one of them brings my name into it, I think it’s fair enough to put out some shit in my defence? I know, I know, I’m old enough to just let it slide, but I’m a delicate flower and I dont like being picked on, so I’m not quite there yet. And it is shit by the way, I’d prefer not to be writing this, but here I am having to defend myself. I suppose if I’d grown up with the internet, I’d be more likely to brush it off, but maybe not, the internet and social media is why thousands of people today live with anxiety? Thank f@#k it wasn’t around when I was a teenager, I would have imploded.
Nowadays, I’d much prefer to spend time with the chickens or the cats, but low and behold, here I am sitting down and writing this shit in an effort to put across an alternative another point of view. I can hardly be bothered to write about climbing anymore because I feel it’s become a massive commercialised industry that many climbers have turned into a narcissistic shit show. I don’t mean Tom here by the way, he appears to be reasonably low key for someone so talented, although because I don’t do any social media, I don’t know, maybe he sprays as good as my cats. Writing this does work my brain that will hopefully delay the onset of dementia so thats a positive I suppose?
So, what did Tom actually say. Well, he said the top arete was contrived and didn’t work because you can reach big holds of another climb from it, (the other climb is Warpath). Each to their own, everyone is entitled to an opinion (there you go, two other cliches that basically act as a harbinger of an insult, hold onto your hat because my fluffiness may be coming to an end!). Tom publishes his climbs on a UKC logbook that are open for everyone to read and his comment about the climb said he thought the top arete was contrived. Then went on to say that he possibly went into Warpath too soon. I’m not sure how there can be confusion, either the whole of the arete was climbed or it wasn’t?
On-sighting routes is definitely the gold standard, but I wonder how many people have not actually climbed a route when trying to on-sight it, but believe they have? Maybe an advantage of being a bit shit and having to headpoint something makes sure you are actually doing the route? Tom’s comments did get me thinking about a few things though, so thanks for that Tom.
In my opinion, many new routes in an area like North Wales are going to be a bit contrived because the best lines were climbed years ago, and thinking about this has made me questioning my motivations. Maybe I do crave to see my name in print in a guidebook, although having had two memoirs published and loads of articles in magazines, books and journals around the world, I’m not so sure?
So, do I climb something new for the personal experience, or is it for other people or a combination of the two? It’s quite satisfying to know you’ve climbed something that others will repeat and hopefully enjoy, but all said and done, I’m a selfish climber and since deciding to cut down on travel and be more local, I get a lot of joy snurfling around the crags of North Wales. So, let’s be clear, it is for me. I really enjoy the whole process of going to a crag and looking around to see what’s what, then throwing a rope down to look at features and wondering if these can be linked. If I can link the features, I’ll have a look at the gear to protect the climb. Working the line, and maybe climbing it is the icing on the cake, and I always feel a bit sad once I’ve successfully climbed a new line, or as in this case, a bit of a mish mash.
OK, spoiler alert for all of you young strong people, much of climbing is contrived. Taking it to its most basic, getting to the top of a cliff by climbing a sheer rock face when you can walk to the same spot makes it contrived. This then leads to the question, why take the more difficult route? There are of course many answers; the physicality, the psychology, the movement, the skill, ego, being outside in a beautiful enviroment. In modern times, as climbing has become more commercial, money and fame are, I suppose, also big motivators.
Bringing it back not only to Pathological, but many new routes I’ve climbed, the experience as a whole is the motivation. In general, I will visit a beautiful place that has birds, other wildlife and flowers. There will be the crashing of the sea, howling seals, bird call. These things remind me the planet is not yet completely wrecked and there is more to life than posting your next selfie on Instawank and increasing Zukerberg’s billions. The mystery of a new line is also a factor. Then it’s about doing something fun and physical. I hope I wouldn’t climb something, or write it up if it doesn’t really hang together as a route. Climbing in North Wales, whether new or established keeps me out of the old peoples home. Tom, please don’t go and climb The Frumious Bandersnatch, also at Rhoscolyn, I think you may be really disappointed, but I had fun so give me that😉.
I do wonder at times if this generation of super strong uber wads are actually having fun? When you are so strong there can’t be many lines in North Wales you can’t climb into another climb and almost every hold must feel humongous? It must be so disappointing being a climber where everything feels so easy or contrived. By the way, when I climbed the first ascent of Pathological I certainly wasn’t looking over from my teetering position on the arete thinking, I’ll just nip into those jugs on Warpath, I can honestly say going into Warpath never entered my mind, it just wasnt an option. I’m not sure I could have even if I wanted to, else I probably would have. I’ve climbed Warpath about twenty times, and I’ve never actually found these massive holds. On occasion, I’ve even been pumped. All these years of climbing thinking that I’m amazing and in reality, I’m shit!
I vividly remember climbing that top arete on Pathological and being fully focused on climbing the arete. I was also focussed on being very pumped and knowing that placing the gear was going to be touch and go (as it happens, I couldn’t place the last small wire and went for it). There is no doubt about this top section being an arete and if the route description says, climb the arete in its entirety using holds on both sides, I think it’s pretty obvious where the climb goes?
It may feel contrived to climb such an obvious feature when there is a climb to the left, but I’ve climbed Right Wall several times (thirty if I’m counting), and at no point have I thought, come on Pete, your climb is so contrived, I can climb into and out of your route all over the place. More to the point as Right Wall came first, how about Lord of the Flies? Maybe the famous film of Big Ron saying “Come on arms, do your stuff” should be edited to, come on Ron, stop being so contrived? Thinking about it, on one of my ascents of Lord, I shuffled along the ledge, sat down and took my shoes off. What a crap route.
While I’m on one, how about that three-star route King Wad on Esgair Maen Gwyn (Scimitar Ridge) first climbed by Paul Pritchard. The first time I climbed this back in the time when dinosaurs walked the planet and social media wasn’t a thing (oh, what lovely innocent times), I not only wanted to test myself, I really enjoyed climbing a route because it was a Paul Pritchard climb. Climbing was about history and connecting to the people who had first climbed these routes, so the fact that the obvious line of King Wad is to climb the first two thirds, then continue up the easy groove to finish, matters not. For anyone who hasn’t climbed it, you do lots of great climbing and then reach a big ledge just beneath the top of the crag. I’ve sat on this ledge many times. Then you traverse right to climb a fantastic arete. The arete is not the line or the obvious way to go, but it is a wonderful feature and so that is what Paul climbed, and the route is an absolute classic. Or is it, maybe for young people today the sense of history or situation or nuance is lost? Maybe its contrived and a bit shit? By the way for those people disgusted by the contrived nature of this brilliant climb, you can climb the arete direct, it’s a great bit of climbing and feels solid E6. I climbed the route like this several years ago but didn’t write it up, I possibly didn’t want my name in a guidebook bad enough at that time? But, maybe this is also contrived as the groove leading to the sit down rest is the easiest and obvious way? Bloody hell, its so confusing being an old climbing duffer.
Climbing can be quite nuanced, but unfortunately, society today gives everyone the opportunity to have a point of view which is good I suppose (the jury is out, not my jury, I think giving everyone a say is crazy, let’s take this article as an example and to quote Fred Hall, opinions are like arseholes, everybody has one!), but not many people appear willing to sit, stop and think for a while before slapping it out there on social media or whatever, and then in general, it’s there for life. Thank heavens there wasn’t an internet when I grew up!
Here is an idea for climbers, when you click on the next problem of the Kilter and Moonboards app, the usual haunt of strong young folk, there should be a warning in red that flashes ‘Remember, what you write on social media or UKC logbooks or say on podcasts is possibly going to make you look a tad of a pillock later in life’.
Maybe all the folk wearing headphones like the ones Grimer talks about in the introduction should be listening to the mantra, Don’t be a numbnut, hold off on saying the first thing that comes into your mind or hitting that publish button and thats possibly that’s what I should have listened to before hitting the publish button on this?
Anyway, see you soon at the Beacon Tom, (possibly on the Moonboard, ha), thanks for the fuel for thought and of course, no offence intended 😉































